Pizzuto v. Randolph
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1209
CAROL L. PIZZUTO,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
REBECCA RANDOLPH; RICHARD LUCAS; MAIN STREET FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION; WILLIAM CRISWELL; KEVIN GESSLER; SHAWN R. TURAK; THE HONORABLE SCOTT R. SMITH; CITY OF WHEELING; JOHN DOE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:10-cv-00017-FPS)
Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 10, 2010
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carol L. Pizzuto, Appellant Pro Se. Keith C. Gamble, PULLIN, FOWLER, FLANAGAN, BROWN & POE, PLLC, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Carol L. Pizzuto seeks to appeal the district court’s
February 9, 2010 “First Order and Notice Regarding Discovery and
Scheduling”. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over
final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory
and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-
46 (1949). The order Pizzuto seeks to appeal is neither a final
order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pizzuto v. Randolph (Pizzuto v. Randolph) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.