Pizzitola v. State
This text of 372 S.W.2d 676 (Pizzitola v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was charged by separate information and, by agreement, was tried before the court at one time on two misdemeanor charges. In Cause No. 36,108, the case under consideration at this time, he was convicted of threatening to take a life, and assessed the punishment of ninety days confinement in jail.
The prosecution and conviction are under Vernon’s Ann.P.C. Art. 1265 which provides that upon conviction of the offense denounced by said article the defendant shall be punished by a fine not less than one hundred nor more than two thousand dollars, and in addition thereto may be imprisoned in jail not exceeding one year.
The judgment assessing appellant’s punishment at 90 days confinement in jail, without the imposition of a fine, was unauthorized and calls for a reversal of the conviction. Persall v. State, 145 Tex.Cr.R. 476, 169 S.W.2d 488 and cases cited therein.
'Due to our disposition of this cause, a discussion of the other propositions of law asserted by appellant is not deemed necessary.
For the reasons stated, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
372 S.W.2d 676, 1963 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1034, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pizzitola-v-state-texcrimapp-1963.