Pivirotto's Estate

97 A. 80, 251 Pa. 548, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 503
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 3, 1916·No. Appeal, No. 130·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We have not been convinced that any reversible error was- committed in the taking of the testimony in this case, and, under it, the claim of the appellant was properly disallowed. The decree is, therefore, affirmed at her costs.-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pivirotto's Estate, 97 A. 80, 251 Pa. 548, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 503 (Pa. 1916).

97 A. 80 (Pivirotto's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jackson v. Buck
77 Pa. D. & C.4th 404 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 2005)
In Re Adoption of S.A.J.
838 A.2d 616 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2003)
Associated Hospital Service v. Pustilnik
439 A.2d 1149 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)
Giesey v. Cogan
179 A. 865 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Advance-Rumely Thresher. Co. v. Rohr
176 A. 825 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1934)