Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Peck
This text of 87 N.E. 153 (Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Peck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action involves the consideration of section one of the employers’ liability act (Acts 1893, p. 294, §8017 Burns 1908). Appellant insists that such act, as applied to it, is in 'conflict with the 14th amendment to the federal Constitution. The question is duly presented. The point is a new one. Other points are presented, but in our opinion they are not well taken. The jurisdiction to decide constitutional questions is in the Supreme Court.
This ease is therefore transferred to the Supreme Court for decision.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
87 N.E. 153, 43 Ind. App. 316, 1909 Ind. App. LEXIS 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pittsburgh-cincinnati-chicago-st-louis-railway-co-v-peck-indctapp-1909.