Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Peck

87 N.E. 644, 172 Ind. 19, 1909 Ind. LEXIS 3
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided March 9, 1909·No. No. 21,407·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The constitutional validity of section one of the employers’ liability act (Acts 1893, p. 294, §8017 Burns 1908) has been firmly settled by the Supreme Court of this State and also by the Supreme Court of the United States. The assertion of appellant’s .counsel that this section is unconstitutional will not serve to lodge the jurisdiction over this appeal in the Supreme Court, which, otherwise, would be in the Appellate Court. It is therefore ordered that this cause be transferred to the Appellate Court. See Pittsburgh, etc., R. Co. v. Rogers (1907), 168 Ind. 483.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Peck, 87 N.E. 644, 172 Ind. 19, 1909 Ind. LEXIS 3 (Ind. 1909).

87 N.E. 644 (Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Peck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blair v. City of Fort Wayne
98 N.E. 736 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1912)
Richey v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.
93 N.E. 1022 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1911)
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Peck
88 N.E. 627 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1909)