Pittsburg, Shawmut & Northern Railroad v. Keating & Smethport Railroad
81 A. 935, 233 Pa. 71, 1911 Pa. LEXIS 466
Opinion
The decree dissolving the prehminary injunction and dismissing the bill is affirmed with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Oemeeod, specially presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pittsburg, Shawmut & Northern Railroad v. Keating & Smethport Railroad, 81 A. 935, 233 Pa. 71, 1911 Pa. LEXIS 466 (Pa. 1911).
81 A. 935 (Pittsburg, Shawmut & Northern Railroad v. Keating & Smethport Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Colcord v. Granzow
1928 OK 211 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1928)
Williams v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad
99 A. 477 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1916)
Kane & Elk Railroad v. Pittsburgh & Western R. R.
88 A. 793 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1913)