Pitts v. State

102 S.E. 381, 25 Ga. App. 31, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 577
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 3, 1920·No. 11174·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence in this case was sufficient to authorize the conviction of the accused, and, the verdict having been approved by the trial judge, this court will not interfere. The judgment overruling the motion for a now trial is

Affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. M. B. Mebane, for plaintiff in error, cited Dorsey v. State, 108 Ga. 477. C. H. Porter, solicitor-general, E. S. Taylor, contra,

cited: Duggan v. State, 116 Ga. 846; Jackson v. State, 322, 329.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pitts v. State, 102 S.E. 381, 25 Ga. App. 31, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 577 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

102 S.E. 381 (Pitts v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carter v. State
47 S.E.2d 815 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)
Bryant v. State
136 S.E. 111 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)