Duggan v. State
43 S.E. 253, 116 Ga. 846, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 102
Opinion
1. Under an indictment for assault with intent to rape there may be a verdict for a simple assault, if the evidence so authorizes.
2. It is discretionary with the presiding judge whether he will reopen a case after both sides have closed and argument has begun.
3. The evidence warranted the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Duggan v. State, 43 S.E. 253, 116 Ga. 846, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 102 (Ga. 1903).
43 S.E. 253 (Duggan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Davis v. State
192 S.E.2d 538 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
Barton v. State
199 S.E. 357 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
O'Brien v. State
177 S.E. 351 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
State v. Henderson
272 P. 97 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1928)
Pitts v. State
102 S.E. 381 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)
Roberts v. State
51 S.E. 374 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)