Pitts v. State

421 So. 2d 788, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28177
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pitts v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1948
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 16, 1982·No. No. AI-214·Published

Opinion

WIGGINTON, Judge.

This case comes to us on appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the entire record, we find no reversible error. The trial court did not err in denying appellant’s motions for judgment of acquittal, there being ample evidence to present a jury question. The trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for continuance did not prejudice appellant, for the alibi witness who threatened not to appear at trial did appear and testify on behalf of appellant. Finally, the trial court did not commit reversible error in not admitting into evidence certain medical documents. The final judgment of conviction and sentence is therefore AFFIRMED.

MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pitts v. State, 421 So. 2d 788, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28177 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

421 So. 2d 788 (Pitts v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)