Pitts v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pitts v. State

421 So. 2d 788, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28177

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 16, 1982

DocketNo. AI-214

StatusPublished

This text of 421 So. 2d 788 (Pitts v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pitts v. State, 421 So. 2d 788, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28177 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

WIGGINTON, Judge.

This case comes to us on appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the entire record, we find no reversible error. The trial court did not err in denying appellant’s motions for judgment of acquittal, there being ample evidence to present a jury question. The trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for continuance did not prejudice appellant, for the alibi witness who threatened not to appear at trial did appear and testify on behalf of appellant. Finally, the trial court did not commit reversible error in not admitting into evidence certain medical documents. The final judgment of conviction and sentence is therefore AFFIRMED.

MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WIGGINTON, Judge.

This case comes to us on appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the entire record, we find no reversible error. The trial court did not err in denying appellant’s motions for judgment of acquittal, there being ample evidence to present a jury question. The trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for continuance did not prejudice appellant, for the alibi witness who threatened not to appear at trial did appear and testify on behalf of appellant. Finally, the trial court did not commit reversible error in not admitting into evidence certain medical documents. The final judgment of conviction and sentence is therefore AFFIRMED.

MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

421 So. 2d 788, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pitts-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack