Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Pittman v. State

Pittman v. State

242 So. 3d 1100
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 7, 2018
DocketCase No. 2D17–3793
StatusPublished

This text of 242 So. 3d 1100 (Pittman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pittman v. State, 242 So. 3d 1100 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Johnson v. State, 60 So. 3d 1045 (Fla. 2011) ; Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; Sweet v. State, 987 So. 2d 747 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) ; Waiter v. State, 965 So. 2d 861 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) ; Haynes v. State, 106 So. 3d 481 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013) ; Paul v. State, 830 So. 2d 953 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).

NORTHCUTT, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

WAITER v. State
965 So. 2d 861 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Paul v. State
830 So. 2d 953 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Hughes v. State
22 So. 3d 132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Sweet v. State
987 So. 2d 747 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Haynes v. State
106 So. 3d 481 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Johnson v. State
60 So. 3d 1045 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
242 So. 3d 1100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pittman-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.