Pittman v. State

242 So. 3d 1100
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 7, 2018·No. Case No. 2D17–3793·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Johnson v. State, 60 So. 3d 1045 (Fla. 2011) ; Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; Sweet v. State, 987 So. 2d 747 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) ; Waiter v. State, 965 So. 2d 861 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) ; Haynes v. State, 106 So. 3d 481 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013) ; Paul v. State, 830 So. 2d 953 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).

NORTHCUTT, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pittman v. State, 242 So. 3d 1100 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

242 So. 3d 1100 (Pittman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

WAITER v. State
965 So. 2d 861 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Paul v. State
830 So. 2d 953 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Hughes v. State
22 So. 3d 132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Sweet v. State
987 So. 2d 747 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Haynes v. State
106 So. 3d 481 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Johnson v. State
60 So. 3d 1045 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2011)