Paul v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Paul v. State

804 So. 2d 612, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 429, 2002 WL 80909

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 23, 2002

DocketNo. 3D01-1880

StatusPublished

This text of 804 So. 2d 612 (Paul v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paul v. State, 804 So. 2d 612, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 429, 2002 WL 80909 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s revocation of probation and sentence.

Appellant argues, and the state concedes, that the written order of revocation does not conform with the oral pronouncements of the trial court. We agree.

The trial court concluded that Appellant did not violate condition seven by using alcohol to excess. It further found that Appellant did not violate the law when he was taken to the County jail. Accordingly, we remand this case with directions to strike any indications to the contrary from the written order.

Affirmed and remanded for correction of the final order revoking probation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s revocation of probation and sentence.

Appellant argues, and the state concedes, that the written order of revocation does not conform with the oral pronouncements of the trial court. We agree.

The trial court concluded that Appellant did not violate condition seven by using alcohol to excess. It further found that Appellant did not violate the law when he was taken to the County jail. Accordingly, we remand this case with directions to strike any indications to the contrary from the written order.

Affirmed and remanded for correction of the final order revoking probation.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

804 So. 2d 612, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 429, 2002 WL 80909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.