Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Pittman v. State

Pittman v. State

903 So. 2d 1030, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9312, 2005 WL 1398215
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pittman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 841 So. 2d 690 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 15, 2005·No. No. 4D05-1130·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied as the trial court had the inherent authority to correct the scrivener’s error in the sentence. Drumwright v. State, 572 So.2d 1029, 1031 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).

STEVENSON, SHAHOOD and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pittman v. State, 903 So. 2d 1030, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9312, 2005 WL 1398215 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

903 So. 2d 1030 (Pittman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Drumwright v. State
572 So. 2d 1029 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)