Pittman v. State
This text of 867 So. 2d 621 (Pittman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Clifford Pittman appeals a new judgment and sentence entered after the cir[622]*622cuit court revoked his probation for driving while license suspended as a habitual offender.1 Mr. Pittman entered a plea of admission to the violations listed in the affidavit of violation of probation. The circuit court entered a new judgment and sentence indicating that Mr. Pittman had violated probation in this case, thus providing this court with jurisdiction to review the revocation. However, the court did not enter a formal order revoking Mr. Pittman’s probation and listing the specific conditions violated. We affirm the revocation, but because there was some confusion at the change of plea hearing, we remand for the circuit court to enter an order revoking probation that specifies that Mr. Pittman admitted violating conditions 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, and 9 of his probation, as charged in the affidavit of violation. Mr. Pittman’s admission did not include the new law violation of burglary.
Affirmed but remanded with instructions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
867 So. 2d 621, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2872, 2004 WL 433851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pittman-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.