Pittman v. Davidge

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Pittman v. Davidge

191 So. 2d 143, 249 La. 768, 1966 La. LEXIS 2156

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 7, 1966·No. No. 48428·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

In re: Pittman and Matheny applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Tangipahoa. 189 So.2d 706.

[769] Writ refused. We find no merit in any of the errors complained of.

FOURNET, C. J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted. This court should not close its eyes to judgments with obvious erroneous or illegal awards. SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion a writ should be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Pittman and Matheny applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Tangipahoa. 189 So.2d 706.

[769] Writ refused. We find no merit in any of the errors complained of.

FOURNET, C. J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted. This court should not close its eyes to judgments with obvious erroneous or illegal awards. SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion a writ should be granted.

Pittman v. Davidge, 191 So. 2d 143, 249 La. 768, 1966 La. LEXIS 2156 (La. 1966).

Pincite

191 So. 2d 143 (Pittman v. Davidge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related