Pistorius v. Travelers Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Pistorius v. Travelers Insurance

532 A.2d 821, 516 Pa. 457, 1987 Pa. LEXIS 825

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 2, 1987·No. Appeal No. 89 W.D.Appeal Dkt.1986·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Prior report: 348 Pa.Super. 527, 502 A.2d 670.

PER CURIAM:

The Court being evenly divided as to whether to render a decision on the merits, the appeal is hereby dismissed.

HUTCHINSON, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. NIX, C.J., and FLAHERTY and McDERMOTT, JJ., would reach the merits of the appeal. LARSEN, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ., would dismiss the appeal as having been improvidently granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Prior report: 348 Pa.Super. 527, 502 A.2d 670.

PER CURIAM:

The Court being evenly divided as to whether to render a decision on the merits, the appeal is hereby dismissed.

HUTCHINSON, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. NIX, C.J., and FLAHERTY and McDERMOTT, JJ., would reach the merits of the appeal. LARSEN, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ., would dismiss the appeal as having been improvidently granted.

Pistorius v. Travelers Insurance, 532 A.2d 821, 516 Pa. 457, 1987 Pa. LEXIS 825 (Pa. 1987).

Pincite

532 A.2d 821 (Pistorius v. Travelers Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related