Pisciotta v. City of New York

92 N.E.2d 460, 300 N.Y. 755, 1950 N.Y. LEXIS 1536
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 13, 1950·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Motion for reargument denied. Motion to amend the remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding thereto the following: “ Upon this appeal there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question of the interpretation of a Federal Statute, namely, the Federal Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act (U. S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 510 et seq.). This Court held that the federal statute did not supersede or suspend the provisions of the Administrative Code of the City of New York, Section 93C-2.0.” [See 300 N. Y. 664.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pisciotta v. City of New York, 92 N.E.2d 460, 300 N.Y. 755, 1950 N.Y. LEXIS 1536 (N.Y. 1950).

92 N.E.2d 460 (Pisciotta v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leidman v. Bingham
116 N.E.2d 496 (New York Court of Appeals, 1953)
Leidman v. Bingham
281 A.D. 822 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953)
Brennan v. City of New York
201 Misc. 162 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)
Brennan v. City of New York
201 Misc. 157 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1951)
Abramson v. City of New York
278 A.D. 382 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)
Lupo v. Board of Transportation
200 Misc. 403 (New York Supreme Court, 1951)
Pisciotta v. City of New York
91 N.E.2d 323 (New York Court of Appeals, 1950)