Piratova v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Piratova v. State

87 So. 3d 67, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5941, 2012 WL 1314215

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 18, 2012·No. No. 3D12-439·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Little v. State, 77 So.3d 722, 722-23 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding that “section 893.13, as amended by section 893.101, Florida Statutes (2002), is constitutional”; rejecting Shelton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, 802 F.Supp.2d 1289, 1308 (M.D.Fla.2011), in which federal court held that section 893.13, Florida Statutes (2004), “violates the due process clause and that the statute is unconstitutional on its face”); Ortega v. State, 76 So.3d 346 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); see also State v. Adkins, 71 So.3d 184 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011), review granted, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Little v. State, 77 So.3d 722, 722-23 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding that “section 893.13, as amended by section 893.101, Florida Statutes (2002), is constitutional”; rejecting Shelton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, 802 F.Supp.2d 1289, 1308 (M.D.Fla.2011), in which federal court held that section 893.13, Florida Statutes (2004), “violates the due process clause and that the statute is unconstitutional on its face”); Ortega v. State, 76 So.3d 346 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); see also State v. Adkins, 71 So.3d 184 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011), review granted, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011).

Piratova v. State, 87 So. 3d 67, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5941, 2012 WL 1314215 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

87 So. 3d 67 (Piratova v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related