Piorkowski v. Socony Vacuum Oil Co.

M.D. Pennsylvania

Piorkowski v. Socony Vacuum Oil Co.

1 F.R.D. 386, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1965

CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

DecidedSeptember 10, 1940

DocketNo. 455

StatusPublished

This text of 1 F.R.D. 386 (Piorkowski v. Socony Vacuum Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Piorkowski v. Socony Vacuum Oil Co., 1 F.R.D. 386, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1965 (M.D. Pa. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

WATSON, District Judge.

This case is before the Court for determination of a motion for a bill of particulars.

This case involves a complaint and a motion similar to that in Alex. Lasicki v. Socony Vacuum Oil Company, Inc., 1 F. R.D. 384, wherein I have this day filed an opinion; hence, the same rules apply as are discussed in that opinion.

It is ordered that the motion for a bill of particulars be, and it is hereby, dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WATSON, District Judge.

This case is before the Court for determination of a motion for a bill of particulars.

This case involves a complaint and a motion similar to that in Alex. Lasicki v. Socony Vacuum Oil Company, Inc., 1 F. R.D. 384, wherein I have this day filed an opinion; hence, the same rules apply as are discussed in that opinion.

It is ordered that the motion for a bill of particulars be, and it is hereby, dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 F.R.D. 386, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1965, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/piorkowski-v-socony-vacuum-oil-co-pamd-1940.