Rosenblum v. Dingfelder

S.D. New York

Rosenblum v. Dingfelder

2 F.R.D. 49, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2092

DecidedJuly 7, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 2 F.R.D. 49 (Rosenblum v. Dingfelder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosenblum v. Dingfelder, 2 F.R.D. 49, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2092 (S.D.N.Y. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

KNOX, District Judge.

Before plaintiff is required to throw open to the inspection of defendant “all of the books, ledgers, records, accounts sales of the two assignor corporations, and accounts sales, letters, telegrams in his possession, which plaintiff intends to use on the trial” the defendant, in conformity with Federal Rules of Procedure, rule 34, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, should, showing good cause therefor, formally move for this relief. When this shall have been done, the Court will be in better position than at present to pass upon the merits of the application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KNOX, District Judge.

Before plaintiff is required to throw open to the inspection of defendant “all of the books, ledgers, records, accounts sales of the two assignor corporations, and accounts sales, letters, telegrams in his possession, which plaintiff intends to use on the trial” the defendant, in conformity with Federal Rules of Procedure, rule 34, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, should, showing good cause therefor, formally move for this relief. When this shall have been done, the Court will be in better position than at present to pass upon the merits of the application.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 F.R.D. 49, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2092, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenblum-v-dingfelder-nysd-1941.