Pioneer Box Co. v. Commissioner

8 B.T.A. 488, 1927 BTA LEXIS 2859
United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided October 4, 1927·No. Docket No. 7024.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[490] OPINION.

Arundell:

The facts in this case relating to the jurisdictional question, it will be readily noted, are on all fours with those in Fort Pitt Spring & Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner, 5 B. T. A. 1106, in which we found the result of the negotiations between the Commissioner and the petitioner to be that “ * * * the Commissioner has determined the correct amount of the tax to be less than the tax admitted to be due by the petitioner on its return * * * ” and that “ Since no deficiency has been determined the board is without jurisdiction * * In accordance with that decision the present proceeding is

Dismissed.

Reviewed by the Board.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pioneer Box Co. v. Commissioner, 8 B.T.A. 488, 1927 BTA LEXIS 2859 (bta 1927).

8 B.T.A. 488 (Pioneer Box Co. v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pioneer Box Co. v. Commissioner
8 B.T.A. 488 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1927)