Pinner v. Barnes

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 MELODIE DAWN PINNER, Case No. 2:24-cv-00301-APG-NJK 8 Plaintiff, Order 9} v. [Docket No. 45] 10] MICHAEL BARNES, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs request for production of documents.' Docket No. 13] 45. Discovery-related documents must be served on the affected party, not filed on the docket, 14] unless ordered by the Court. See, e.g., Local Rule 26-7; Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d)(1).. No such order 15} has been entered in this case. Accordingly, the Court STRIKES the above-referenced document, 16] and INSTRUCTS the parties to refrain from filing discovery documents on the docket in the future 17} absent a Court order that they do so. 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 Dated: September 4, 2025 A Nancy J. Koppe 21 United States-Mapistrate Judge 22 23 24 25 26

' The Court liberally construes the filings of pro se litigants, particularly those who are 28] prisoners bringing civil rights claims. Blaisdell v. Frappiea, 729 F.3d 1237, 1241 (9th Cir. 2013).