Pinner v. Barnes

Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6| MELODIE DAWN PINNER, Case No. 2:24-cv-00301-APG-NJK 7 Plaintiff, ORDER v. [Docket No. 38] 91 MICHAEL BARNES et al., 10 Defendants. 11 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs motion to update the names of Defendants.! Docket 12] No. 38. No response has been filed. Accordingly, the motion to update is GRANTED as 13] unopposed. See Local Rule 7-2(d). 14 The Clerk’s Office is INSTRUCTED to update the docket in that (1) Barnes is changed to Michael Barnes; (2) Moon Kim is changed to Mun H. Kim Jr.; (3) Bateman is changed to 16] Johnathon Bateman; (4) Ruch is changed to James N. Ruch; (5) Toby is changed to Tobey D. 17|| Morris. 18 On July 16, 2025, the Court entered an order extending the deadline to serve Defendant 19] Kim. Docket No. 31. Plaintiff is REMINDED that the deadline to effectuate service as to 20|| Defendant Mun H. Kim Jr. is September 15, 2025. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Dated: September 3, 2025

Nancy J. Koppa\ 24 United Sas Magistrate Judge 25 26

' The Court liberally construes the filings of pro se litigants, particularly those who are 28] prisoners bringing civil rights claims. Blaisdell v. Frappiea, 729 F.3d 1237, 1241 (9th Cir. 2013).