Home/New York Court of Appeals/Pinero v. RITE AID OF NEW YORK, INC

Pinero v. RITE AID OF NEW YORK, INC

783 N.E.2d 895, 99 N.Y.2d 541, 753 N.Y.S.2d 805
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 12, 2002
StatusPublished

This text of 783 N.E.2d 895 (Pinero v. RITE AID OF NEW YORK, INC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pinero v. RITE AID OF NEW YORK, INC, 783 N.E.2d 895, 99 N.Y.2d 541, 753 N.Y.S.2d 805 (N.Y. 2002).

Opinion

99 N.Y.2d 541 (2002)
783 N.E.2d 895
753 N.Y.S.2d 805

CAJ H. PINERO, Appellant,
v.
RITE AID OF NEW YORK, INC., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided December 12, 2002.

*542 Robert J. Tolchin, New York City, for appellant.

Friedberg & Raven, LLP, New York City (Scott Gurtman of counsel), for respondent.

Michaels & Smolak, P.C., Auburn (Michael G. Bersani of counsel), for New York State Trial Lawyers Association, amicus curiae.

Concur: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK, WESLEY, ROSENBLATT and GRAFFEO.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs. The Appellate Division properly determined that plaintiff's accident was not within the reasonably foreseeable risks of the defendant's alleged negligence (see, Di Ponzio v Riordan, 89 NY2d 578, 583-584).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Di Ponzio v. Riordan
679 N.E.2d 616 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)
Pinero v. Rite Aid of New York, Inc.
783 N.E.2d 895 (New York Court of Appeals, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
783 N.E.2d 895, 99 N.Y.2d 541, 753 N.Y.S.2d 805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pinero-v-rite-aid-of-new-york-inc-ny-2002.