Pinero v. Rite Aid of New York, Inc.
783 N.E.2d 895, 99 N.Y.2d 541, 753 N.Y.S.2d 805, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 3786
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs. The Appellate Division properly determined that plaintiffs accident was not within the reasonably foreseeable risks of the defendant’s alleged negligence (see, Di Ponzio v Riordan, 89 NY2d 578, 583-584).
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley, Rosenblatt and Graffeo.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pinero v. Rite Aid of New York, Inc., 783 N.E.2d 895, 99 N.Y.2d 541, 753 N.Y.S.2d 805, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 3786 (N.Y. 2002).
783 N.E.2d 895 (Pinero v. Rite Aid of New York, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pinero v. RITE AID OF NEW YORK, INC
783 N.E.2d 895 (New York Court of Appeals, 2002)