Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority v. Indish-Militello

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority v. Indish-Militello

819 So. 2d 1011, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9387, 2002 WL 1401714

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 1, 2002·No. No. 1D02-1959·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority timely petitions this court to review an order which denied its motion to dismiss the respondent’s claim against the Authority now pending before the Florida Commission on Human Relations. Petitioner, however, fails to demonstrate that “review of the final agency decision would not provide an adequate remedy,” the showing necessary to obtain interlocutory review pursuant to section 120.68(1), Florida Statutes. See Johnson v. Henningson, 370 So.2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). Accordingly, the petition is denied.

PETITION DENIED.

ALLEN, C.J., BARFIELD and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority timely petitions this court to review an order which denied its motion to dismiss the respondent’s claim against the Authority now pending before the Florida Commission on Human Relations. Petitioner, however, fails to demonstrate that “review of the final agency decision would not provide an adequate remedy,” the showing necessary to obtain interlocutory review pursuant to section 120.68(1), Florida Statutes. See Johnson v. Henningson, 370 So.2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). Accordingly, the petition is denied.

PETITION DENIED.

ALLEN, C.J., BARFIELD and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority v. Indish-Militello, 819 So. 2d 1011, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9387, 2002 WL 1401714 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

819 So. 2d 1011 (Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority v. Indish-Militello) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related