Johnson v. Henningson
This text of 370 So. 2d 60 (Johnson v. Henningson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Henry JOHNSON, Etc., et al., Petitioners,
v.
John D. HENNINGSON, Etc., et al., Respondents.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
George B. Pomeroy of Pomeroy, Betts, Pomeroy & Moses, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioners.
Richard A. Barnett of Law Office of Krupnick & Campbell, Fort Lauderdale, for respondents.
PER CURIAM.
The trial court denied petitioners' motion to dismiss the second amended complaint in a wrongful death case. Clearly this alleged error, if any, can be adequately remedied on plenary appeal. We have repeatedly held that this court will not grant certiorari to review interlocutory orders under these circumstances. Chalfonte Development Corp. v. Beaudoin, 370 So.2d 58, Fourth District Court of Appeal Case No. 78-2715, Opinion filed April 18, 1979; Santini Brothers, Inc. v. Grover, 338 So.2d 79 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); Siegel v. Abramowitz, 309 So.2d 234 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); Solitron Devices, Inc. v. Reiland, 311 So.2d 729 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). See also: Esler v. Gabinet, 369 So.2d 93 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).
CERTIORARI DENIED.
DOWNEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
370 So. 2d 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-henningson-fladistctapp-1979.