Pineda v. Skinner Services, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pineda v. Skinner Services, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 22 F.4th 47
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided January 7, 2022·No. 20-1097E·Errata

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

Nos. 20-1097 20-1141

JOSE PINEDA, JOSE MONTENEGRO, MARCO LOPEZ, and JOSE HERNANDEZ, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs, Appellees,

v.

SKINNER SERVICES, INC., d/b/a Skinner Demolition, THOMAS SKINNER, DAVID SKINNER, ELBER DINIZ, and SANDRO SANTOS,

Defendants, Appellants.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court, issued on December 30, 2021, is amended as follows:

On page 14, footnote 5, replace "assets is unavailable" with "assets are unavailable."

On page 17, line 23, add "and" between "part" and "denying."

- 1 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pineda v. Skinner Services, Inc., (1st Cir. 2022).

Pineda v. Skinner Services, Inc. (Pineda v. Skinner Services, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.