Pine Bluff Water & Light Co. v. McCain
This text of 34 S.W. 549 (Pine Bluff Water & Light Co. v. McCain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The facts in this case are similar to those in the case of Pine Bluff Water & Light Company v. Schneider, just decided, (ante, p. 109) except that the plaintiff was guilty of no contributory negligence.
The injury was occasioned by the same explosion caused by the co-operating negligence of Hammert and tbe water and light company. The case is controlled by the rule announced in the recent case of City Electric Railway Co. v. Conery. Conery was injured by the concurring negligence of the railway company and a third party. It was held that both parties whose negligence directly contributed to cause the injury were liable therefor. City Electric Ry. Co. v. Conery, 61 Ark. 381; Atkinson v. Goodrich Transportation Co. 60 Wis. 141; Shearman & Red. Neg. sec. 34. Whittaker’s Smith, Neg., 31, and note. The judgment of the circuit court is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 S.W. 549, 62 Ark. 118, 1896 Ark. LEXIS 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pine-bluff-water-light-co-v-mccain-ark-1896.