Pine Bluff Water & Light Co. v. Derrisseaux
19 S.W. 428, 56 Ark. 132, 1892 Ark. LEXIS 119
Opinion
The court found specially that the appellant company through its employees opened a ditch in the public street, that they negligently left it unguarded, and that the appellee’s cow fell into it in the night-time and was killed; and judgment was rendered, for its value. As the bill of exceptions does not profess to set forth all the testimony, the only question presented by the record is, does the judgment follow from the special findings? We answer in the affirmative.
Affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pine Bluff Water & Light Co. v. Derrisseaux, 19 S.W. 428, 56 Ark. 132, 1892 Ark. LEXIS 119 (Ark. 1892).
19 S.W. 428 (Pine Bluff Water & Light Co. v. Derrisseaux) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rucker v. Aymett
219 S.W.2d 181 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1949)
Rowland v. Quarles
100 S.W.2d 991 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1936)
J. C. Mahan Motor Co. v. Lyle
67 S.W.2d 745 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1934)
Talley v. Tigrett
69 S.W.2d 243 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1933)
Frazier v. Nashville Veterinary Hospital
139 Tenn. 440 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1917)