Pine Bluff Water & Light Co. v. Derrisseaux

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Pine Bluff Water & Light Co. v. Derrisseaux

19 S.W. 428, 56 Ark. 132, 1892 Ark. LEXIS 119

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedApril 30, 1892

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 19 S.W. 428 (Pine Bluff Water & Light Co. v. Derrisseaux) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pine Bluff Water & Light Co. v. Derrisseaux, 19 S.W. 428, 56 Ark. 132, 1892 Ark. LEXIS 119 (Ark. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

Cockriee, C. J.

The court found specially that the appellant company through its employees opened a ditch in the public street, that they negligently left it unguarded, and that the appellee’s cow fell into it in the night-time and was killed; and judgment was rendered, for its value. As the bill of exceptions does not profess to set forth all the testimony, the only question presented by the record is, does the judgment follow from the special findings? We answer in the affirmative.

Affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cockriee, C. J.

The court found specially that the appellant company through its employees opened a ditch in the public street, that they negligently left it unguarded, and that the appellee’s cow fell into it in the night-time and was killed; and judgment was rendered, for its value. As the bill of exceptions does not profess to set forth all the testimony, the only question presented by the record is, does the judgment follow from the special findings? We answer in the affirmative.

Affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 S.W. 428, 56 Ark. 132, 1892 Ark. LEXIS 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pine-bluff-water-light-co-v-derrisseaux-ark-1892.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack