Pincus v. Commissioner

Board of Tax Appeals

Pincus v. Commissioner

18 B.T.A. 930, 1930 BTA LEXIS 2568

United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided January 27, 1930·No. Docket Nos. 31938, 31939.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION.

Lansdon :

On the facts as set forth above the determination of the Commissioner must be approved. Prior to December 31, 1923. [931] Pincus, Sachs, and Brown owned interests in a business partnership and on that date Brown sold his share thereof to the other two partners and thereafter had no interest in the good will or other assets of the concern. Sir William Plender, 2 B. T. A. 940.

Decision will be entered for the respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION.

Lansdon :

On the facts as set forth above the determination of the Commissioner must be approved. Prior to December 31, 1923. [931] Pincus, Sachs, and Brown owned interests in a business partnership and on that date Brown sold his share thereof to the other two partners and thereafter had no interest in the good will or other assets of the concern. Sir William Plender, 2 B. T. A. 940.

Decision will be entered for the respondent.

Pincus v. Commissioner, 18 B.T.A. 930, 1930 BTA LEXIS 2568 (bta 1930).

Pincite

18 B.T.A. 930 (Pincus v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related