Pina v. New York State Gaming Commission
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK FREDERICK PIÑA, Plaintiff, -against- 24cv5383 (LTS) NEW YORK STATE GAMING 25cv4117 (LTS) COMMISSION; BRIAN O’DWYER; JOHN A. CROTTY; SYLVIA B. HAMER; MARTIN CIVIL JUDGMENT J. MACK; PETER J. MOSCHETTI JR.; MARISSA SHORENSTEIN; JERRY SKURNIK; SCIENTIFIC GAMES, Defendants. For the reasons stated in the July 23, 2025, order, this action is dismissed. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court’s judgment would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Civil judgment is entered dismissing Piña I, No. 24-CV-5383. SO ORDERED. Dated: July 24, 2025 New York, New York
/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pina v. New York State Gaming Commission (Pina v. New York State Gaming Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.