Pillo v. Stricklin

Ohio Supreme Court

Pillo v. Stricklin

104 Ohio St. 3d 637

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 2, 2005·No. No. 2004-0753·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Hopkins v. Dyer, 104 Ohio St.3d 461, 2004-Ohio-6769, 820 N.E.2d 329.

James R. Recupero, Attorney at Law, L.L.C., and James R. Recupero, for appellants. Gallagher, Sharp, Fulton & Norman, Jay Clinton Rice, Robert H. Eddy, and Richard C.O. Rezie, for appellee Continental Casualty Company. Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent. Lanzinger, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Hopkins v. Dyer, 104 Ohio St.3d 461, 2004-Ohio-6769, 820 N.E.2d 329.

James R. Recupero, Attorney at Law, L.L.C., and James R. Recupero, for appellants. Gallagher, Sharp, Fulton & Norman, Jay Clinton Rice, Robert H. Eddy, and Richard C.O. Rezie, for appellee Continental Casualty Company. Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent. Lanzinger, J., not participating.

Pillo v. Stricklin, 104 Ohio St. 3d 637 (Ohio 2005).

Pincite

104 Ohio St. 3d 637 (Pillo v. Stricklin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related