Pillo v. Stricklin

Ohio Supreme Court

Pillo v. Stricklin

104 Ohio St. 3d 637

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 2, 2005

DocketNo. 2004-0753

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 104 Ohio St. 3d 637 (Pillo v. Stricklin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pillo v. Stricklin, 104 Ohio St. 3d 637 (Ohio 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Hopkins v. Dyer, 104 Ohio St.3d 461, 2004-Ohio-6769, 820 N.E.2d 329.

James R. Recupero, Attorney at Law, L.L.C., and James R. Recupero, for appellants. Gallagher, Sharp, Fulton & Norman, Jay Clinton Rice, Robert H. Eddy, and Richard C.O. Rezie, for appellee Continental Casualty Company. Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent. Lanzinger, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Hopkins v. Dyer, 104 Ohio St.3d 461, 2004-Ohio-6769, 820 N.E.2d 329.

James R. Recupero, Attorney at Law, L.L.C., and James R. Recupero, for appellants. Gallagher, Sharp, Fulton & Norman, Jay Clinton Rice, Robert H. Eddy, and Richard C.O. Rezie, for appellee Continental Casualty Company. Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent. Lanzinger, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 Ohio St. 3d 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pillo-v-stricklin-ohio-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack