Pierson v. Watkins
122 Tex. 318
This text of 122 Tex. 318 (Pierson v. Watkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pierson v. Watkins, 122 Tex. 318 (Tex. 1933).
Opinion
The motion for leave to file the petition for writ of mandamus and prohibition is overruled, without prejudice to the rights of relators to again present the subject-matter of the application to this- Court, should it be subsequently shown that the available remedies in the District Court and Court of Civil Appeals are inadequate to protect the rights of the relators.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
122 Tex. 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pierson-v-watkins-tex-1933.