Pierre v. State

923 So. 2d 1193, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3559, 2006 WL 626053
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pierre v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 973 So. 2d 547
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 15, 2006·No. No. 3D05-2671·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Regis Camillo Pierre appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing.

Under State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235 (Fla.1996), affirmative misadvice regarding the amount of time to be served on an agreed sentence can be a basis for post-conviction relief. See also Fisher v. State, 824 So.2d 1050 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Bauder v. State, 768 So.2d 1232 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Gonzales v. State, 766 So.2d 452 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Carter v. State, 752 So.2d 725 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Bell v. State, 746 So.2d 515 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Rensoli v. State, 718 So.2d 1278 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). As there is nothing in the record to affirmatively and conclusively refute Pierre’s claim, we reverse and remand this matter for an evidentiary hearing on the merits of the claim.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pierre v. State, 923 So. 2d 1193, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3559, 2006 WL 626053 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

923 So. 2d 1193 (Pierre v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rensoli v. State
718 So. 2d 1278 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Carter v. State
752 So. 2d 725 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Gonzales v. State
766 So. 2d 452 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Bell v. State
746 So. 2d 515 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Fisher v. State
824 So. 2d 1050 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
State v. Leroux
689 So. 2d 235 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
Bauder v. State
768 So. 2d 1232 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)