Bauder v. State
768 So. 2d 1232, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12701, 2000 WL 1471741
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 4, 2000·No. No. 3D00-263·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
We reverse the order denying defendant’s post-conviction relief motion and remand for further proceedings. Under State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235 (Fla.1996), and its progeny, defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on the issue of whether trial counsel misrepresented to defendant the amount of time defendant would serve on his sentence. Bell v. State, 746 So.2d 515 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Rensoli v. State, 718 So.2d 1278 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); see Rivero v. State, 744 So.2d 1255 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bauder v. State, 768 So. 2d 1232, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12701, 2000 WL 1471741 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
768 So. 2d 1232 (Bauder v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pierre v. State
923 So. 2d 1193 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Jordan v. State
833 So. 2d 266 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Bell v. State
770 So. 2d 226 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Baro v. State
768 So. 2d 1232 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)