Pierce v. Wells Fargo Bank
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1176
TORNELLO PIERCE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WELLS FARGO BANK, James Hanson (Vice President),
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cv-00755-WLO)
Submitted: May 31, 2007 Decided: June 6, 2007
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tornello Pierce, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas G. Hooper, NELSON, MULLINS, RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, L.L.P., Charlotte, North Carolina, Joseph Samuel Dowdy, NELSON, MULLINS, RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Tornello Pierce appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing
as frivolous his civil action. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Pierce v. Wells Fargo Bank, No.
1:06-cv-00755-WLO (M.D.N.C. Feb. 14, 2007). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pierce v. Wells Fargo Bank (Pierce v. Wells Fargo Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.