Pierce v. Wells Fargo Bank

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 6, 2007·No. 07-1176·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1176

TORNELLO PIERCE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WELLS FARGO BANK, James Hanson (Vice President),

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cv-00755-WLO)

Submitted: May 31, 2007 Decided: June 6, 2007

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tornello Pierce, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas G. Hooper, NELSON, MULLINS, RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, L.L.P., Charlotte, North Carolina, Joseph Samuel Dowdy, NELSON, MULLINS, RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Tornello Pierce appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing

as frivolous his civil action. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Pierce v. Wells Fargo Bank, No.

1:06-cv-00755-WLO (M.D.N.C. Feb. 14, 2007). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pierce v. Wells Fargo Bank, (4th Cir. 2007).

Pierce v. Wells Fargo Bank (Pierce v. Wells Fargo Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.