Pierce v. Wells Fargo Bank

Fourth Circuit

Pierce v. Wells Fargo Bank

229 F. App'x 240

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 6, 2007·No. No. 07-1176·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Tornello Pierce appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismiss[241]*241ing as frivolous his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pierce v. Wells Fargo Bank, No. l:06-cv-00755-WLO (M.D.N.C. Feb. 14, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Tornello Pierce appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismiss[241]*241ing as frivolous his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pierce v. Wells Fargo Bank, No. l:06-cv-00755-WLO (M.D.N.C. Feb. 14, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Pierce v. Wells Fargo Bank, 229 F. App'x 240 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

229 F. App'x 240 (Pierce v. Wells Fargo Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.