Pierce v. Pierce

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Pierce v. Pierce

60 N.H. 355

DecidedDecember 5, 1880

StatusPublished

This text of 60 N.H. 355 (Pierce v. Pierce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pierce v. Pierce, 60 N.H. 355 (N.H. 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

Blodgett, J.

Truesdale v. Straw, 58 N. H. 207, is a decisive authority against the defendant; but, without regard to that case, we think there is no ground for holding that a common-law award can be impeached in any proceeding, simply for the allowance of claims barred by the statute of limitations.

.Exceptions overruled.

Stanley, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blodgett, J.

Truesdale v. Straw, 58 N. H. 207, is a decisive authority against the defendant; but, without regard to that case, we think there is no ground for holding that a common-law award can be impeached in any proceeding, simply for the allowance of claims barred by the statute of limitations.

.Exceptions overruled.

Stanley, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 N.H. 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pierce-v-pierce-nh-1880.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack