Pierce v. Pierce

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Pierce v. Pierce

60 N.H. 355

Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided December 5, 1880·Published

Opinion

Blodgett, J.

Truesdale v. Straw, 58 N. H. 207, is a decisive authority against the defendant; but, without regard to that case, we think there is no ground for holding that a common-law award can be impeached in any proceeding, simply for the allowance of claims barred by the statute of limitations.

.Exceptions overruled.

Stanley, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blodgett, J.

Truesdale v. Straw, 58 N. H. 207, is a decisive authority against the defendant; but, without regard to that case, we think there is no ground for holding that a common-law award can be impeached in any proceeding, simply for the allowance of claims barred by the statute of limitations.

.Exceptions overruled.

Stanley, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Pierce v. Pierce, 60 N.H. 355 (N.H. 1880).

Pincite

60 N.H. 355 (Pierce v. Pierce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related