Pierce v. Felts

99 S.E. 139, 23 Ga. App. 665, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 274
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 22, 1919
Docket10161
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 99 S.E. 139 (Pierce v. Felts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pierce v. Felts, 99 S.E. 139, 23 Ga. App. 665, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 274 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

There being in the bill of exceptions no exception to any final judgment, but only an exception to the judgment striking the defendant’s pleas, the bill of exceptions must be dismissed. This is true even though the record shows that the ease was finally terminated by a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. McCranie v. Shipp, 10 Ga. App. 544 (73 S. E. 701).

Writ of error dismissed.

Bloodworth and Stephens, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lynch v. Nations
173 S.E. 203 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Lawrenceville Cotton Co. v. Southern Railway Co.
129 S.E. 290 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Oliver v. Gordy
108 S.E. 250 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 S.E. 139, 23 Ga. App. 665, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pierce-v-felts-gactapp-1919.