Pierce v. Felts
99 S.E. 139, 23 Ga. App. 665, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 274
Opinion
There being in the bill of exceptions no exception to any final judgment, but only an exception to the judgment striking the defendant’s pleas, the bill of exceptions must be dismissed. This is true even though the record shows that the ease was finally terminated by a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. McCranie v. Shipp, 10 Ga. App. 544 (73 S. E. 701).
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pierce v. Felts, 99 S.E. 139, 23 Ga. App. 665, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 274 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).
99 S.E. 139 (Pierce v. Felts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lynch v. Nations
173 S.E. 203 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Lawrenceville Cotton Co. v. Southern Railway Co.
129 S.E. 290 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Oliver v. Gordy
108 S.E. 250 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)