Oliver v. Gordy

108 S.E. 250, 27 Ga. App. 349, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 889
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedAugust 3, 1921
Docket12497
StatusPublished

This text of 108 S.E. 250 (Oliver v. Gordy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oliver v. Gordy, 108 S.E. 250, 27 Ga. App. 349, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 889 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Hill, J.

The exceptions pendente lite to the judgment sustaining demurrers to the defendant’s' plea and answer are preserved in the record. It not' appearing, however, either from the bill of exceptions or the record, that any final judgment was ever rendered, the motion of the defendant in error to dismiss the bill of exceptions is sustained. Woodall v. Harris, 22 Ga. App. 69 (95 S. E. 377); Pierce v. Felts, 23 Ga. App. 665 (99 S. E. 139); Johnson v. Battle, 120 Ga. 649 (2) (48 S. E. 128).

Writ of error dismissed.

Jenlcins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Battle
48 S.E. 128 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
Woodall v. Harris
95 S.E. 377 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Pierce v. Felts
99 S.E. 139 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 S.E. 250, 27 Ga. App. 349, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oliver-v-gordy-gactapp-1921.