Pierce v. Cullens

Supreme Court of Georgia

Pierce v. Cullens

100 S.E.2d 732, 213 Ga. 649

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedNovember 8, 1957

Docket19870

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 100 S.E.2d 732 (Pierce v. Cullens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pierce v. Cullens, 100 S.E.2d 732, 213 Ga. 649 (Ga. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

Since the evidence shows that the petitioner, who is seeking the writ of mandamus to require the city officials of the City of Dublin to issue him a building permit, has not executed an agreement required by ordinance of the city as a prerequisite to the issuance of such permit, a judgment denying the relief sought is demanded, and it was error to grant the writ. Compare City of Pearson v. Glidden Co., 205 Ga. 738 (55 S. E. 2d 125); Hadden v. Pierce, 212 Ga. 45 (90 S. E. 2d 405).

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

Since the evidence shows that the petitioner, who is seeking the writ of mandamus to require the city officials of the City of Dublin to issue him a building permit, has not executed an agreement required by ordinance of the city as a prerequisite to the issuance of such permit, a judgment denying the relief sought is demanded, and it was error to grant the writ. Compare City of Pearson v. Glidden Co., 205 Ga. 738 (55 S. E. 2d 125); Hadden v. Pierce, 212 Ga. 45 (90 S. E. 2d 405).

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 S.E.2d 732, 213 Ga. 649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pierce-v-cullens-ga-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack