Pierce v. Cullens

100 S.E.2d 732, 213 Ga. 649
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 8, 1957·No. 19870·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

Since the evidence shows that the petitioner, who is seeking the writ of mandamus to require the city officials of the City of Dublin to issue him a building permit, has not executed an agreement required by ordinance of the city as a prerequisite to the issuance of such permit, a judgment denying the relief sought is demanded, and it was error to grant the writ. Compare City of Pearson v. Glidden Co., 205 Ga. 738 (55 S. E. 2d 125); Hadden v. Pierce, 212 Ga. 45 (90 S. E. 2d 405).

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pierce v. Cullens, 100 S.E.2d 732, 213 Ga. 649 (Ga. 1957).

100 S.E.2d 732 (Pierce v. Cullens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edenfield v. Mingledorff
109 S.E.2d 588 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1959)
Cullens v. Pierce
105 S.E.2d 223 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1958)