Edenfield v. Mingledorff

Supreme Court of Georgia

Edenfield v. Mingledorff

109 S.E.2d 588, 215 Ga. 182, 1959 Ga. LEXIS 428

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJune 5, 1959

Docket20484

StatusPublished

This text of 109 S.E.2d 588 (Edenfield v. Mingledorff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edenfield v. Mingledorff, 109 S.E.2d 588, 215 Ga. 182, 1959 Ga. LEXIS 428 (Ga. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Hawkins, Justice.

The “Regulations Governing Sewage Disposal” in Chatham County are not attacked, and since the record shows that the, petitioner, who is seeking the writ of [183]*183mandamus- -to require the county officials to issue her a construction permit for the installation of a septic tank on a lot 100 feet by 100 feet, has not submitted plans and specifications showing the approximate number of persons to be served by the septic tank, the number of bedroopns in the residence, the distance to the nearest water supply, stream, dwelling and trees, as required by said ordinance of Chatham County as a prerequisite to the issuance of such permit, the trial judge did not err in denying the mandamus rule sought by the plaintiff, who is now plaintiff in error. Pierce v. Cullens, 213 Ga. 649 (100 S. E. 2d 732).

Argued May 11, 1959 Decided June 5, 1959 Rehearing denied July 8, 1959. John R. Calhoun, for plaintiff in error. John J. Bouhan, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hawkins, Justice.

The “Regulations Governing Sewage Disposal” in Chatham County are not attacked, and since the record shows that the, petitioner, who is seeking the writ of [183]*183mandamus- -to require the county officials to issue her a construction permit for the installation of a septic tank on a lot 100 feet by 100 feet, has not submitted plans and specifications showing the approximate number of persons to be served by the septic tank, the number of bedroopns in the residence, the distance to the nearest water supply, stream, dwelling and trees, as required by said ordinance of Chatham County as a prerequisite to the issuance of such permit, the trial judge did not err in denying the mandamus rule sought by the plaintiff, who is now plaintiff in error. Pierce v. Cullens, 213 Ga. 649 (100 S. E. 2d 732).

Argued May 11, 1959 Decided June 5, 1959 Rehearing denied July 8, 1959. John R. Calhoun, for plaintiff in error. John J. Bouhan, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 S.E.2d 588, 215 Ga. 182, 1959 Ga. LEXIS 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edenfield-v-mingledorff-ga-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack