Picray v. Secretary of State
This text of 936 P.2d 974 (Picray v. Secretary of State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
David PICRAY, Respondent on Review,
v.
SECRETARY OF STATE, Petitioner on Review.
Supreme Court of Oregon.
Rives Kistler, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the petition were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.
David C. Force, Eugene, argued the cause and filed a response for respondent on review.
Before CARSON, C.J., and GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN, FADELEY, GRABER and DURHAM, JJ.[**]
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed by an equally divided court. The order of the Secretary of State is reversed.
NOTES
[**] Kulongoski, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
936 P.2d 974, 325 Or. 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/picray-v-secretary-of-state-or-1997.