Pickett v. GM
This text of Pickett v. GM (Pickett v. GM) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JUANITA PICKETT, Plaintiff, 20-CV-0075 (CM) -against- ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEE OR AMENDED IFP APPLICATION GM; MOTOR LIQUIDATION CO., Defendants. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: Plaintiff brings this action pro se. To proceed with a civil action in this Court, a plaintiff must either pay $400.00 in fees – a $350.00 filing fee plus a $50.00 administrative fee – or, to request authorization to proceed without prepayment of fees, that is, in forma pauperis (“IFP”) submit a signed IFP application. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. Plaintiff submitted an IFP application, but her responses do not establish that she is unable to pay the filing fees. Plaintiff states that she is not presently employed, but she fails to answer any of the questions concerning her income and financial situation. Because Plaintiff fails to supply sufficient information about her income, expenses, and any assets she may have, the Court is unable to conclude that she lacks sufficient funds to pay the filing fees for this action. Accordingly, within thirty days of the date of this order, Plaintiff must either pay the $400.00 in fees or submit an amended IFP application. If Plaintiff submits an amended IFP application, it should be labeled with docket number 20-CV-0075 (CM), and address the deficiencies indicated above by providing information to establish that she is unable to pay the filing fees. Plaintiff must answer each question on the amended IFP application, state all sources of income and all monthly expenses, and describe how she is able to support himself. If the Court grants the amended IFP application, Plaintiff will be permitted to proceed without prepayment of fees. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. No summons shall issue at this time. If Plaintiff complies with this order, the Court shall process the case in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk’s Office. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, the Court will dismiss the action. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: January 13, 2020 New York, New York hie. In hik COLLEEN McMAHON Chief United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pickett v. GM, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pickett-v-gm-nysd-2020.