Phull v. Interstate Management Co

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 23, 2006·No. 05-1829·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1829

SHIRLEY PHULL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

INTERSTATE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-04-1536-1)

Submitted: February 28, 2006 Decided: March 23, 2006

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elaine C. Bredehoft, Peter C. Cohen, CHARLSON, BREDEHOFT & COHEN, P.C., Reston, Virginia, for Appellant. Michael A. Viccora, Susan Jeanblanc Cohen, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Shirley Phull appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on her civil action alleging claims of employment

discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Phull v. Interstate Mgmt. Co., No. CA-04-1536-1 (E.D. Va. July 8,

2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phull v. Interstate Management Co, (4th Cir. 2006).

Phull v. Interstate Management Co (Phull v. Interstate Management Co) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.