Phull v. Interstate Management Co.

Fourth Circuit

Phull v. Interstate Management Co.

171 F. App'x 992

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 23, 2006·No. No. 05-1829·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Shirley Phull appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her civil action alleging claims of employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Phull v. Interstate Mgmt. Co., No. CA-04-1536-1 (E.D.Va. July 8, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Shirley Phull appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her civil action alleging claims of employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Phull v. Interstate Mgmt. Co., No. CA-04-1536-1 (E.D.Va. July 8, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Phull v. Interstate Management Co., 171 F. App'x 992 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

171 F. App'x 992 (Phull v. Interstate Management Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.