Phull v. Interstate Management Co
This text of Phull v. Interstate Management Co (Phull v. Interstate Management Co) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1829
SHIRLEY PHULL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
INTERSTATE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-04-1536-1)
Submitted: February 28, 2006 Decided: March 23, 2006
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elaine C. Bredehoft, Peter C. Cohen, CHARLSON, BREDEHOFT & COHEN, P.C., Reston, Virginia, for Appellant. Michael A. Viccora, Susan Jeanblanc Cohen, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Shirley Phull appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on her civil action alleging claims of employment
discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Phull v. Interstate Mgmt. Co., No. CA-04-1536-1 (E.D. Va. July 8,
2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Phull v. Interstate Management Co, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phull-v-interstate-management-co-ca4-2006.