Phoenix Insurance v. Amereno
This text of 297 A.D.2d 381 (Phoenix Insurance v. Amereno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in temporarily staying the arbitration proceeding and directing the appellants to comply with all outstanding discovery demands (see CPLR 3102 [c]; Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Baez, 269 AD2d 392; Matter of Peerless Ins. Co. v McDonough, 269 AD2d 398; Hendler & Murray v Lambert, 127 AD2d 820). Altman, J.P., Feuerstein, Friedmann, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
297 A.D.2d 381, 746 N.Y.2d 605, 746 N.Y.S.2d 605, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phoenix-insurance-v-amereno-nyappdiv-2002.