Phoenix Insurance v. Amereno
297 A.D.2d 381, 746 N.Y.2d 605, 746 N.Y.S.2d 605, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8148
Opinion
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in temporarily staying the arbitration proceeding and directing the appellants to comply with all outstanding discovery demands (see CPLR 3102 [c]; Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Baez, 269 AD2d 392; Matter of Peerless Ins. Co. v McDonough, 269 AD2d 398; Hendler & Murray v Lambert, 127 AD2d 820). Altman, J.P., Feuerstein, Friedmann, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Phoenix Insurance v. Amereno, 297 A.D.2d 381, 746 N.Y.2d 605, 746 N.Y.S.2d 605, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8148 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).
297 A.D.2d 381 (Phoenix Insurance v. Amereno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hendler & Murray, P. C. v. Lambert
127 A.D.2d 820 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
In re Allstate Insurance v. Baez
269 A.D.2d 392 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Peerless Insurance v. McDonough
269 A.D.2d 398 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)