Peerless Insurance v. McDonough

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Peerless Insurance v. McDonough

269 A.D.2d 398, 702 N.Y.S.2d 880, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1226

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 7, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 269 A.D.2d 398 (Peerless Insurance v. McDonough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peerless Insurance v. McDonough, 269 A.D.2d 398, 702 N.Y.S.2d 880, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1226 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to temporarily stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim to allow for discovery in aid of arbitration, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), dated January 27, 1999, which granted the petition and directed the respondent to comply with all outstanding discovery demands.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in temporarily staying the arbitration proceeding and directing the respondent to comply with all outstanding discovery demands (see, CPLR 3102 [c]; Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Baez, 269 AD2d 392 [decided herewith]; Hendler & Murray v Lambert, 127 AD2d 820). Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman, Florio and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to temporarily stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim to allow for discovery in aid of arbitration, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), dated January 27, 1999, which granted the petition and directed the respondent to comply with all outstanding discovery demands.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in temporarily staying the arbitration proceeding and directing the respondent to comply with all outstanding discovery demands (see, CPLR 3102 [c]; Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Baez, 269 AD2d 392 [decided herewith]; Hendler & Murray v Lambert, 127 AD2d 820). Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman, Florio and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

269 A.D.2d 398, 702 N.Y.S.2d 880, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peerless-insurance-v-mcdonough-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack