Phinny v. Hay
175 A.D. 945
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1916·Published
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The provision thereon as to striking out the denials in paragraph 10 of the answer does not preclude the defendants to plead denials of the existence of any fact alleged in the complaint in order “ to [946]*946perfect the answer as a complete affirmative defense.” (See Einstein v. Einstein, 158 App. Div. 500; Douglass v. Phenix Ins. Co., 138 N. Y. 216.) Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Oarr, Mills and ¡Rich, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Phinny v. Hay, 175 A.D. 945 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).
175 A.D. 945 (Phinny v. Hay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Douglass v. Phenix Insurance
33 N.E. 938 (New York Court of Appeals, 1893)
Einstein v. Einstein
158 A.D. 498 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)