Einstein v. Einstein

158 A.D. 501, 143 N.Y.S. 707, 1913 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7383

This text of 158 A.D. 501 (Einstein v. Einstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Einstein v. Einstein, 158 A.D. 501, 143 N.Y.S. 707, 1913 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7383 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

McLaughlin, J.:

This appeal is from an order denying a motion to strike out, as irrelevant and redundant, certain allegations of the complaint set forth in an affirmative defense.

The question presented is precisely similar to the one considered in an action by this plaintiff against Monroe Einstein, decided herewith. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case (158 App. Div. 498) the order here appealed from is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Einstein v. Einstein
158 A.D. 498 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 A.D. 501, 143 N.Y.S. 707, 1913 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/einstein-v-einstein-nyappdiv-1913.